View Full Version : Rate the above sig.
Everchanging
12-26-2005, 12:00 AM
Now that we have image sigs I think it's a good idea to make this thread.
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 12:04 AM
Now that we have image sigs I think it's a good idea to make this thread.
Not bad. Background desperately needs depth, though.
7/10
Tuton
12-26-2005, 06:53 AM
Not bad. Background desperately needs depth, though.
7/10
I dunno, I always thought sigs look crispier with one image. But otherwise the sigs themselves are really cool.
Bottom: 8.55555/10
Top: 9/10
PoppinPete
12-26-2005, 08:29 AM
I dunno, I always thought sigs look crispier with one image. But otherwise the sigs themselves are really cool.
Bottom: 8.55555/10
Top: 9/10
8/10
I made it though ^_^
VDecK
12-26-2005, 09:35 AM
8/10
I made it though ^_^
D: couldnt be bothered rating them all so i give them a 6/10
PoppinPete
12-26-2005, 09:41 AM
D: couldnt be bothered rating them all so i give them a 6/10
8/10 the lighting on the left side seems a bit too harsh...
VDecK
12-26-2005, 10:28 AM
8/10 the lighting on the left side seems a bit too harsh...
yea, its worse when you look at that sig on my laptop D=
Tuton
12-26-2005, 10:30 AM
8/10. It's actually a really interesting style. Kinda abstract/tech/grunch all shoved into one. :confused:
Everchanging
12-26-2005, 02:13 PM
8/10. It's actually a really interesting style. Kinda abstract/tech/grunch all shoved into one. :confused:
Pretty cool. 7/10
VDecK
12-26-2005, 02:17 PM
Pretty cool. 7/10
5/10, background doesnt really go with the render.
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 02:32 PM
5/10, background doesnt really go with the render.
7/10.
Nice, just too... empty and white...
And the red beam seems to be coming out of his visor at the wrong angle. O.o
You guys can go ahead and skip me.
cxn926
12-26-2005, 02:33 PM
7/10.
Nice, just too... empty and white...
And the red beam seems to be coming out of his visor at the wrong angle. O.o
You guys can go ahead and skip me.
10/10
Nothing bad about it. Lol :p
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 02:38 PM
10/10
Nothing bad about it. Lol :p
Top: Nice, I like it. Lacks something though. 7/10
Bottom: The text color doesn't go with the rest of the sig, background is lacking, etc. 3/10. Sorry
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 02:40 PM
Top: Nice, I like it. Lacks something though. 7/10
Bottom: The text color doesn't go with the rest of the sig, background is lacking, etc. 3/10. Sorry
Top: 10/10. Great sig
Bottom: I don't really like the color, or some of the shading , but that's just me. It's good. 8/10
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 02:42 PM
Top: 10/10. Great sig
Bottom: I don't really like the color, or some of the shading , but that's just me. It's good. 8/10
No sig to rate. D:
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 02:43 PM
No sig to rate. D:
Top:
AWESOME AGAIN!
10/10
There, now I have a sig to rate!
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 02:47 PM
Top:
AWESOME AGAIN!
10/10
There, now I have a sig to rate!
Really really really really really really simple. I'm guessing its your first? Sseeing as its your first, 5/10.
(And thanks, I like how mine turned out :))
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 02:49 PM
Really really really really really really simple. I'm guessing its your first? Sseeing as its your first, 5/10.
(And thanks, I like how mine turned out :))
It's my second, but I spent about a minute on it, so I wasn't expecting anything that amazing.
And I'm not really a big fan of renders and complexities.
Burn, dodge, blur, brush. Yep.
Everchanging
12-26-2005, 02:49 PM
Really really really really really really simple. I'm guessing its your first? Sseeing as its your first, 5/10.
(And thanks, I like how mine turned out :))
Top 10/10
Bottom 9/10
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 06:15 PM
Not bad, as I said earlier. A deffinite improvement, although the abstract background doesnt go with the render. 7/10
cxn926
12-26-2005, 06:39 PM
Not bad, as I said earlier. A deffinite improvement, although the abstract background doesnt go with the render. 7/10
top 10/10
bottom 8/10
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 06:40 PM
top 10/10
bottom 8/10
9/10
Really good.
I want Rage to rate mine. XP
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 06:42 PM
9/10
Really good.
I want Rage to rate mine. XP
The person who made that amazing sig deserves head.
<<
>>
Verdest
12-26-2005, 06:42 PM
The person who made that amazing sig deserves head.
<<
>>
9.5/10
8.7/10
Don't rate mine until I change it.
EDIT: Changed it. :P
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 06:43 PM
The person who made that amazing sig deserves head.
<<
>>
Your sigs:
20/20 overall.
Everchanging
12-26-2005, 08:17 PM
Your sigs:
20/20 overall.
Very sexiful. 10/10
Slowhand
12-26-2005, 08:18 PM
Very sexiful. 10/10
Thanks. :)
As I've said twice before, 7/10. :D
Chaotic
12-26-2005, 08:19 PM
Very sexiful. 10/10
XD
I like that word.
_ _ _
9/10.
The abstract back doesn't go with the render very much, but it's still really really good.
Verdest
12-26-2005, 08:19 PM
Thanks. :)
As I've said twice before, 7/10. :D
9.5/10
8.7/10
Your ratings are up there.^
PoppinPete
12-26-2005, 09:23 PM
Your ratings are up there.^
Meh, an average of 8/10
cxn926
12-27-2005, 06:42 PM
5/10 overall
Good rate for the animation and hot chicks
Slowhand
12-27-2005, 06:57 PM
5/10 overall
Good rate for the animation and hot chicks
Top: 7/10.
Bottom: Looks like you just put a lens glare and text on a picture. =/ 5/10
Chaotic
12-27-2005, 09:31 PM
Top: 7/10.
Bottom: Looks like you just put a lens glare and text on a picture. =/ 5/10
|-|4vv7 53>< / 10
Everchanging
12-27-2005, 10:27 PM
|-|4vv7 53>< / 10
Top is vry vry sexiful! 10/10
Bottom one has Spider Man badassifulness. 11/10
VDecK
12-28-2005, 11:13 AM
Top is vry vry sexiful! 10/10
Bottom one has Spider Man badassifulness. 11/10
render kinda sticks out from the background but other than that 6/10
AlmightyDavid
12-28-2005, 11:17 AM
render kinda sticks out from the background but other than that 6/10
0/0 (put that in your calculator)
VDecK
12-28-2005, 11:20 AM
0/0 (put that in your calculator)
^^
Nice sig, background is good and it got rated above novice!!!!1eleventy
7/10
megansplittstoesser
12-28-2005, 01:49 PM
Now that we have image sigs I think it's a good idea to make this thread.
9/10 way better than I could do(sorry, that might not be saying much! :)) ...not crazy about the theme though.
GuitarFreak
01-04-2006, 10:00 PM
9/10 way better than I could do(sorry, that might not be saying much! :)) ...not crazy about the theme though.
0/10
No sig...
cxn926
01-04-2006, 10:57 PM
0/10
No sig...
9/10
Emo sig and dancing ninja!
Duckman_Drake
01-10-2006, 11:19 PM
9/10
Emo sig and dancing ninja!
Good sig, need more blue ir yellow in it.
Everchanging
01-10-2006, 11:38 PM
Good sig, need more blue ir yellow in it.
The top one's disgusting. 0/10
The bottom one's ok but kinda bland. 7/10
Duckman_Drake
01-10-2006, 11:45 PM
The top one's disgusting. 0/10
The bottom one's ok but kinda bland. 7/10
Lol, how cute, you still think girls have cooties. Go back to elementary school.
Everchanging
01-10-2006, 11:48 PM
Lol, how cute, you still think girls have cooties. Go back to elementary school.
Wow, you are really immature. Now I know why Andrew thinks you're Aquateen91. THINKING ANIME GIRLS ARE SEXY IS FREAKIN NASTY YOU SICK FREAK!
Bahamut
01-11-2006, 01:35 AM
8/10.
Rate my ****ing awesome sig.
edit: No word censors, kick ass!
PoppinPete
01-11-2006, 06:50 AM
8/10.
Rate my ****ing awesome sig.
edit: No word censors, kick ass!
Your ****ing awesome sig gets *drumroll*
*10/10* because your in denial, you have no sig, just accept it...
Duckman_Drake
01-12-2006, 11:13 AM
Your ****ing awesome sig gets *drumroll*
*10/10* because your in denial, you have no sig, just accept it...
Pretty plain. I think this is the only sig that i havn't seen you animate.
7/10
Slowhand
01-12-2006, 05:04 PM
Pretty plain. I think this is the only sig that i havn't seen you animate.
7/10
Top: The vectors dont go with the grunge background at all, and the top of the render is too blurry. The text sucks, and to top it off, no border. 6/10
Bottom: Backgrounds lacking depth, text sucks, overall pretty bad sig. 5/10
Everchanging
01-14-2006, 11:21 AM
Top: 9
Bottom: 8
Verdest
01-14-2006, 02:14 PM
Top: 9
Bottom: 8
Top: 10/10
Great lighting and depth.
Bottom: 6/10
Nice and simple, so it's good, but it's just too simple.
Verdest
01-17-2006, 10:31 PM
Top: 10/10
Great lighting and depth.
Bottom: 6/10
Nice and simple, so it's good, but it's just too simple.
10/10 lolzors!
I want my new sig rated. D:
Quartz
01-17-2006, 10:36 PM
Rate me.
Go easy I haven't made a sig in 3 months.
D:
Verdest
01-17-2006, 10:39 PM
Rate me.
Go easy I haven't made a sig in 3 months.
D:
I wont until you rate me D:
Quartz
01-17-2006, 10:39 PM
I wont until you rate me D:
7/10
It's nothing new...
Verdest
01-17-2006, 10:40 PM
7/10
It's nothing new...
6/10, the backgrounds not that great, and I don't like how the render fits in. Not bad for your first in a month though. in which case it gets an 8/10
Quartz
01-17-2006, 10:47 PM
Yessssss....
Damn you flood control...always slowing me down..
Uh-oh kids...
52.62 posts per day
Everchanging
01-17-2006, 11:49 PM
Yessssss....
Damn you flood control...always slowing me down..
Uh-oh kids...
52.62 posts per day
It's a little bland but I bet if you keep making them you'll get back in the swing of things and make more awesome ones like your old stuff. I like how it says Quartz on his armband...I think it says Quartz. D: 8/10
Double_Felix
01-17-2006, 11:52 PM
It's a little bland but I bet if you keep making them you'll get back in the swing of things and make more awesome ones like your old stuff. I like how it says Quartz on his armband...I think it says Quartz. D: 8/10
1: I like it, it's my style.
2: Good.
3: Cool, but a bit dark.
no numbars 4 u.
Quartz
01-17-2006, 11:53 PM
It's a little bland but I bet if you keep making them you'll get back in the swing of things and make more awesome ones like your old stuff. I like how it says Quartz on his armband...I think it says Quartz. D: 8/10
:P
***** are you crazy?!
It's not.
Everchanging
01-22-2006, 10:59 PM
:P
***** are you crazy?!
It's not.
;________;
Daigo
01-23-2006, 03:09 PM
;________;
You know what I think of your sig. :)
Dreadnaut
02-06-2006, 09:41 PM
You know what I think of your sig. :)
I like it, the effect over the render is really kinda cool, though the render choice is a little iffy, the font doesnt blend well at all though.
on a scale from 7 to asparagus, you four nunchucks.
Daigo
02-06-2006, 10:24 PM
I like it, the effect over the render is really kinda cool, though the render choice is a little iffy, the font doesnt blend well at all though.
on a scale from 7 to asparagus, you four nunchucks.
I don't know **** about fonts. :(
Neway, your sig is very good. I like your other one better. 9.5/10
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 03:04 PM
I don't know **** about fonts. :(
Neway, your sig is very good. I like your other one better. 9.5/10
You don't have a sig. Could anyone get me one?
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 04:19 PM
You don't have a sig. Could anyone get me one?
He's banned you stupid ****.... click his profile to see...
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 04:37 PM
You don't have a sig. Could anyone get me one?
Wait... unless you are daigo... makes perfect sense! YOU SUCK AT SNEAKING BACK!
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 05:40 PM
Wait... unless you are daigo... makes perfect sense! YOU SUCK AT SNEAKING BACK!
Why would that make perfect sense? And also, I was just making a post that related to the topic. I don't want to come in here and just ask for a sig out of the blue.
VDecK
02-08-2006, 05:46 PM
Wait... unless you are daigo... makes perfect sense! YOU SUCK AT SNEAKING BACK!
Can't really rate the top sig ^^
bottom sig gets 11/10 for being so L33T
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 05:55 PM
Why would that make perfect sense? And also, I was just making a post that related to the topic. I don't want to come in here and just ask for a sig out of the blue.
It makes perfect sense!
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 05:57 PM
It makes perfect sense!
You never said how.
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 06:04 PM
You never said how.
It makes perfect sense!
shup daigo
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 06:07 PM
It makes perfect sense!
shup daigo
Ah, since saying it the third time will make me believe you.:rolleyes:
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 06:10 PM
Ah, since saying it the third time will make me believe you.:rolleyes:
daigo always did the eye rolley thing! You're definately him!
pwnd!
Slowhand
02-08-2006, 06:11 PM
daigo always did the eye rolley thing! You're definately him!
pwnd!
And you can just tell hes a lover of ghey pr0n.
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 06:13 PM
daigo always did the eye rolley thing! You're definately him!
pwnd!
I'm sure other members have used that smiley before. Besides, what wrong with using a smiley that represents your voice?:p ;) :D :(
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 06:20 PM
I'm sure other members have used that smiley before. Besides, what wrong with using a smiley that represents your voice?:p ;) :D :(
Only daigo would have said taht!
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 06:21 PM
Only daigo would have said taht!
But would DAigo have said this!!?? :eek:
ftw_59
02-08-2006, 06:33 PM
But would DAigo have said this!!?? :eek:
No but now you're just trying to cover your tracks... if you aren't daigo then who are you!
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 06:34 PM
No but now you're just trying to cover your tracks... if you aren't daigo then who are you!
Can't you read? FreudianSlip. Duh.
Or do you mean my real name?
Frosted_Chaos
02-08-2006, 08:58 PM
Can't you read? FreudianSlip. Duh.
Or do you mean my real name?
uhh...
3/10
i hate those things...
FreudianSlip
02-08-2006, 11:01 PM
uhh...
3/10
i hate those things...
I just picked a random sig to use temporarily.
Top: 9.5/10
Bottom: 8/10
vBulletin® v3.7.4, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.